Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drowning Shakespeare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Meh. I don't like to delete borderline notable bands, but I don't see anything that passes WP:MUSIC here. Black Kite 23:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drowning Shakespeare[edit]

Article fails to establish any significance or notability for the band according to WP:MUSIC. Non notable band signed to a non notable record label. No chart success. No extensive media coverage. Nouse4aname (talk) 08:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If the albums were on Victory itself i think they would be eligible per WP:MUSIC; but as it is they're on an independent that is only distributed by Victory. i don't think they're quite there yet. tomasz. 11:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - one album on a minor indie label and no coverage in reliable sources does not meet WP:MUSIC. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This band is a significant face of Cape Breton Culture and should be kept on wikipedia. This band has had a large effect on Nova Scotia musically and they have already exported their music throughout Canada and are doing it worldwide in 2008 evaneditor. 11:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Anything that matches any of these twelve points? That's what we need. tomasz. 15:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.